Legal Opinion

Rowen v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 28, 1981No. Civ. 60458PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

POTTER, J.

Petitioner Kenneth H. Rowen, an attorney, seeks review and annulment of an en banc order of the respondent Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) 1 adjudging him in contempt of the WCAB and ordering him to pay a fine of $500. Simply stated, petitioner contends that the finding of contempt should be annulled by this court as; (1) petitioner was denied a speedy determination of the contempt charge; (2) the WCAB committed procedural irregularities * during the contempt proceedings; and, (3) substantial evidence does not support the finding of contempt. 2

We do not believe…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Carmona v. Division of Industrial SafetyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Arthur v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Universal Consolidated Oil Co. v. ByramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Griggs v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Mathews v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hustedt v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Howitt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. Crawford v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  4. Betsworth v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Morongo Band of Mission Indians v. StachDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API