Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Maney.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 2017No. 2016-1494PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

*201 {¶ 1} Respondent, Thomas Patrick Maney Jr., of Columbus, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0029042, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1983.

{¶ 2} In a December 1, 2015 complaint, relator, disciplinary counsel, alleged that Maney violated several professional-conduct rules by neglecting a single client's matter, failing to reasonably communicate with the client about the status *202 of his case, and submitting false statements and evidence during the ensuing investigation.

{¶ 3} Based on the parties' stipulations and Maney's hearing testimony, a panel of the Board of Professional Conduct…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Goldfuss v. DavidsonOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. BroerenOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. AnthonyOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Warren Cty. Bar Assn. v. Vardiman (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. CharacterOhio Supreme Court · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Bruner (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Lorain Cty. Bar Assn. v. Hadeed (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. ManeyOhio Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API