Legal Opinion
State v. Farnum
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 8, 2004No. AC 24025PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*328 Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The defendant, William Famum, appeals from the judgments of conviction, rendered after a trial to the court, of two counts of robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-134 (a) (4), one count of larceny in the sixth degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-125b (a) and one count of larceny in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-124 (a) (2). On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial, court improperly denied (1) his motion to suppress identification evidence obtained as a result of a photographic array because the array…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. BoscarinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. ReddickConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- State v. WalshConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- State v. FieldsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- State v. FieldsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. FarnumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Farnum v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- State v. FarnumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004