Legal Opinion
State v. Reddick
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 28, 1993No. 10500PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-134 (a) (4).1
On appeal the defendant asserts that the trial court improperly (1) allowed into evidence an impermissively suggestive in-court identification of the defendant, (2) refused to order the state to produce the transcript of testimony given by a witness in a prior prosecution involving this defendant in a different judicial district, *314(3) permitted the jury, on the issue of identity, to consider evidence of the defendant’s…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- State v. FloydSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- State v. HansenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- State v. RogersConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- State v. CrumpConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- State v. OliphantConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.