Legal Opinion

Loftin v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided November 20, 1936No. A-9093PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavenport, J.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of the crime of attempt to commit burglary, and his punishment fixed for a term of two years in the state penitentiary. He will hereafter be referred to as the defendant.

This is a companion case to cases Nos. A-9089 and A-9166, W. J. Luker v. State, 60 Okla. Cr. 151, 161, 62 Pac. (2d) 255, 259, and reference is made to the two cases for the testimony as it is not deemed necessary to set it out in full in this case. The testimony is sufficient to sustain the conviction.

It is urged by the defendant that the court erred in admitting the testimony of witness…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Berg v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Tillery v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Patterson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Beck v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Luker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1936

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Richardson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1953
  2. Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1944
  3. Holt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API