Legal Opinion

Clark v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided June 14, 1944No. A-10294PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarefoot, J.

Defendant, E. H. Clark, was charged in the district court of Kay county with the crime of larceny of an automobile, was tried, convicted and sentenced to serve a term of six years in the State Penitentiary, and has appealed.

In his brief defendant presents two propositions for reversal of this case:

“First Proposition. All evidence obtained by unlawful and unreasonable search and seizure is inadmissible in the trial of an accused.
“Second proposition. The -taking of an automobile for the purpose of taking tires and accessories therefrom, but without intent to permanently deprive the owner of the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. RembertDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1922
  2. Denton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Gaines v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Brumley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. O'NeillWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. People v. MichaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. People v. SimonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. State v. BrooksWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  5. People v. ViceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API