Legal Opinion

Luker v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided October 23, 1936No. A-9089PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavenport, J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, was convicted of assault without justifiable or excusable cause with intent to injure, and sentenced to imprisonment in the state penitentiary for two years. Motion for new trial was filed, overruled, exceptions saved, and the defendant has appealed to this court.

The evidence in substance is as follows: B. F. Smith was owner and operator of a feed store in Olustee; the rear of the building was inclosed, and adjoining the main building and fronting, on the street was a large gate entering into the inclosure; on the night in…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pickett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Choate v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Welch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Berg v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sears v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1945
  2. Mendenhall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1946
  3. Richardson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1953
  4. State v. LumleyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1947
  5. Loftin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API