Legal Opinion
Mustafa v. Camacho
Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands
Decided September 4, 2013No. S. Ct. Civil No. 2013-0049PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
(September 4, 2013)
2Per curiam
This matter comes before the Court on Appellees’ “Motion to Dismiss,” which this Court construes as a Motion for Summary Action. See V.I.S.Ct. I.O.P. 9.4. In their motion, Appellees contend that Appellants had no right for the Appellate Division of the Superior Court to consider their appeal of a decision rendered by the Magistrate Division of the Superior Court because they failed to pay the *568$50.00 docketing fee or move to proceed in forma pauperis. We agree, and consequently vacate the Appellate Division’s June 14, 2013 Order.
1. BACKGROUND
On April 3,…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Long v. Atlantic City Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- H&H Avionics, Inc. v. Virgin Islands Port AuthoritySupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2009
- Oliver T. Carr Management, Inc. v. National Delicatessen, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Browne v. GoreSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by14 opinions
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. ConnorSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
- In re the Adoption of L.O.F.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
- King v. AppletonSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
- Ottley v. Estate of BellSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
- Sweeney v. OmbresSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.