Legal Opinion

Corral v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 14, 1979No. Civ. 3615PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROWN (G. A.), P. J.

In this action against State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm), based upon an alleged breach of its duty of good faith and fair dealing, the trial court granted State Farm’s motion for summary judgment. The insureds, Luis Corral (Luis) and his daughter, Mary Alice Corral (Mary), have appealed.

State Farm’s policy of liability insurance issued to Luis contained uninsured motorist coverage and medical payments coverage. The coverage extended to Mary who, at the time of the accident in question, was driving Luis’ vehicle with the permission of Luis.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Stationers Corp. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Silberg v. California Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Walsh v. WalshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Porn v. National Grange Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  2. Eichman v. Fotomat Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. Thibodeau v. CrumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Opperman v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  5. Ben Villarreal Jr., Cleo Martinez, and Lacasa Martinez Texmex, Inc. v. United Fire & Casualty Company D/B/A United Fire GroupSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API