Legal Opinion
Apeldyn Corp. v. Sony Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided April 4, 2012No. Civ. No. 11-440-SLRPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Apeldyn Corporation (“Apeldyn”) filed a complaint alleging infringement of its U.S. Patent No. 5,347,382 (“the '382 patent”) by defendants Sony Corporation and Sony Electronics, Inc. (collectively, “Sony”) on May 19, 2011. (D.I. 1) Therein, Apeldyn alleged that Sony infringes the '382 patent and induces infringement of the '382 patent by virtue of its making, selling, and importing “products that are made by a method that infringes one or more claims of the '382 patent,” and that Sony’s “infringement has been and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
- A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Monec Holding AG v. Motorola Mobility, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2012
- Zond, Inc. v. Fujitsu Semiconductor Ltd.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
- Rembrandt Social Media, LP v. Facebook, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2013
- Aeritas, LLC v. Alaska Air Group, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2012
- Fairchild Semiconductor Corp. v. Power Integrations, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.