Legal Opinion
Aeritas, LLC v. Alaska Air Group, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided September 28, 2012No. Civ. No. 11-967-SLRPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Aeritas, LLC (“Aeritas”) filed a complaint on October 13, 2011, alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,933,589 (“the '589 patent”) and 7,209,903 (“the '903 patent”) by Alaska Air Group, Inc. (“AAG”). (D.I. 1) On December 9, 2011, in lieu of an answer, AAG moved to dismiss the complaint. (D.I. 8) In response, Aeritas filed a first amended complaint, mooting AAG’s motion. (D.I. 10) AAG moved to dismiss the first amended complaint on January 20, 2012. (D.I. 13) For the reasons that follow, the court grants in part…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Christopher v. HarburySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dermafocus LLC v. Ulthera, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2016
- Zond, Inc. v. Fujitsu Semiconductor Ltd.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
- Telecomm Innovations, LLC v. Ricoh Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 2013
- Evonik Degussa GMBH v. Materia, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2018
- Fairchild Semiconductor Corp. v. Power Integrations, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2013