Legal Opinion
Haislmaier v. Zache
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided October 27, 1964PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.
The determinative issue is whether time is of the essence of the contract.
In Rottman v. Endejan (1959), 6 Wis. (2d) 221, 225, 226, 94 N. W. (2d) 596, a case dealing with a contract for the purchase of land, the court stated-:
“The law is well settled that time will not be regarded as of the essence unless it is made so by the terms of the contract or the conduct of the parties. Long Investment Co. v. O’Donnell (1958), 3 Wis. (2d) 291, 297, 88 N. W. (2d) 674, and Zuelke v. Gergo (1951), 258 Wis. 267, 271, 45 N. W. (2d) 690.. . This court in Buntrock v. Hoffman (1922), 178 Wis. 5, 13, 189 N. W.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Buntrock v. HoffmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
- Zuelke v. GergoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
- Phillips v. CarverWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
- Long Investment Co. v. O'DONNELLWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- Peyer v. JacobsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lundin v. ShimanskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
- M & I Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. PumpWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Gonis v. New York Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- In re First Phoenix-Weston, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2017
- Stork v. FelperCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.