Legal Opinion

Quick v. American Legion 1960 Convention Corp.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1967PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

Standards employed when reviewing an order for a new trial in the interests of justice.

When a trial judge has ordered a new trial in the interests of justice that order will be affirmed unless there is a clear showing of an abuse of discretion. Van Gheem v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. (1967), 33 Wis. 2d 231, 236, 147 N. W. 2d 237. Though it is within the power of this court to reverse, such an order will be reversed only upon the showing of a clear abuse of discretion. McPhillips v. Blomgren (1966), 30 Wis. 2d 134, 140 N. W. *1352d 267; Combs v. Peters (1964), 23 Wis. 2d 629, 127 N. W. 2d 750, 129 N. W.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Statz v. PohlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Hillstead v. ShawWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. McPhillips v. BlomgrenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Huebner v. FischerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Bolssen v. HeenanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Builders, Inc. v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Loomans v. Milwaukee Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Steinhorst v. H. C. Prange Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Bartell v. LuedtkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Krolikowski v. Chicago & Northwestern Transportation Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API