Quick v. American Legion 1960 Convention Corp.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.
Standards employed when reviewing an order for a new trial in the interests of justice.
When a trial judge has ordered a new trial in the interests of justice that order will be affirmed unless there is a clear showing of an abuse of discretion. Van Gheem v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. (1967), 33 Wis. 2d 231, 236, 147 N. W. 2d 237. Though it is within the power of this court to reverse, such an order will be reversed only upon the showing of a clear abuse of discretion. McPhillips v. Blomgren (1966), 30 Wis. 2d 134, 140 N. W. *1352d 267; Combs v. Peters (1964), 23 Wis. 2d 629, 127 N. W. 2d 750, 129 N. W.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Statz v. PohlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Hillstead v. ShawWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- McPhillips v. BlomgrenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Huebner v. FischerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Bolssen v. HeenanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Wisconsin Builders, Inc. v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Loomans v. Milwaukee Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Steinhorst v. H. C. Prange Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Bartell v. LuedtkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Krolikowski v. Chicago & Northwestern Transportation Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.