Legal Opinion

Valer v. Bartelson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 2011No. 20110114PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Neil Bartelson and Diane Fischer appeal from a district court order that concluded the court did not have jurisdiction to decide whether funds expended pri- or to the appointment of a guardian and conservator were misappropriated. We conclude the court erred in determining it did not have jurisdiction over the misappropriation claim, and we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

I

[¶ 2] Ralph Bartelson had four children — Jean Valer, Jane Haught, Neil Bar-telson, and Diane Fischer. The children agreed that Ralph Bartelson would move into Valer’s home and that Valer…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nodak Mutual Insurance Company v. Ward County Farm BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Rolette County Social Service Board v. B.E.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Rebel v. Nodak Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Gustafson v. Estate of PoitraNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Lindemann v. LindemannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Estate of BartelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Estate of BrandtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Estate of Vaage v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Estate of BartelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  5. In Re Estate of BartelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API