Valer v. Bartelson
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] Neil Bartelson and Diane Fischer appeal from a district court order that concluded the court did not have jurisdiction to decide whether funds expended pri- or to the appointment of a guardian and conservator were misappropriated. We conclude the court erred in determining it did not have jurisdiction over the misappropriation claim, and we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
I
[¶ 2] Ralph Bartelson had four children — Jean Valer, Jane Haught, Neil Bar-telson, and Diane Fischer. The children agreed that Ralph Bartelson would move into Valer’s home and that Valer…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Nodak Mutual Insurance Company v. Ward County Farm BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Rolette County Social Service Board v. B.E.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Rebel v. Nodak Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Gustafson v. Estate of PoitraNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Lindemann v. LindemannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
3Cited by8 opinions
- Estate of BartelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Estate of BrandtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Estate of Vaage v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Estate of BartelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- In Re Estate of BartelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.