Legal Opinion
Rebel v. Nodak Mutual Insurance Co.
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided November 4, 1998No. Civil 980121PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Nick Haas appealed from a summary judgment declaring an insurance policy issued by Nodak Mutual Insurance Company (Nodak) to Ron Rebel, Jr., Ron Rebel, and Nick Rebel does not cover damages for injuries Haas suffered while employed by a custom-farming business owned by the Rebels. We conclude Haas has no standing to challenge the coverage provisions in the insurance contract between the Rebels and No-dak, and we dismiss the appeal.
[¶2] The Rebels owned and farmed land near Mott. During 1993, the Rebels also ran a custom-farming business as a partnership, and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Miller v. ShugartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Garvis v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Langer v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1939
- Medcenter One, Inc. v. North Dakota State Board of PharmacyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Fisher v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Nodak Mutual Insurance Company v. Ward County Farm BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Forsman v. Blues Brews and Bar-B-Ques Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Triple Quest, Inc. v. Cleveland Gear Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Kjolsrud v. MKB Management Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- McPhee v. TuftyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.