Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Bartelson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 2019No. 20180255PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tufte, Justice.

[¶1] Jean Valer and Jane Haught appeal from a district court order denying their motion for reconsideration of a judgment determining they failed to rebut the presumption that they exercised undue influence over their father. We conclude the court did not abuse its discretion in denying their motion for reconsideration, and we affirm.

I

[¶2] This is the fourth appeal to this Court in proceedings involving the Estate of Ralph Bartelson and his four adult children: Valer, Haught, Neil Bartelson, and Diane Fischer. Estate of Bartelson , 2015 ND 147 , 864 N.W.2d 441 (" Bartelson III…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Shull v. WalckerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Anderson v. BakerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Kautzman v. DollNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Hildebrand v. StolzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Estate of BartelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Curtiss v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  2. James Vault & Precast Co. v. B&B Hot Oil Serv., Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Don's Garden Center v. The Garden DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Sherwood v. SherwoodNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
  5. State ex rel. City of Marion v. AlberNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API