Legal Opinion

Hagans v. Haines

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided December 2, 1998No. CA 98-301PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John F. Stroud, Jr., Judge.

James E. and Bonnie J. Hagans appeal the denial of their complaint for specific performance of a contract for the sale of commercial real estate. They contend that the Pope County Chancery Court erred 1) in permitting extrinsic evidence of a collateral matter to alter the terms of or to attack an executed, integrated agreement; and 2) in finding that there was no enforceable contract. We agree on both points and reverse and remand.

At a hearing before the chancellor, testimony for appellants was given by Mr. Hagans and Rita Gilbreath, a title company employee,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fort Smith Service Finance Corp. v. ParrishSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  2. Brown v. AquilinoCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
  3. Dziga v. Muradian Business Brokers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1989
  4. Luningham v. Arkansas Poultry Federation Insurance TrustCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
  5. Cate v. IrvinCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bank of America, N.A. v. C.D. Smith Motor Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  2. Johnston v. CurtisCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Armstrong Remodeling & Construction, LLC v. CardenasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012
  4. Pruitt v. Dickerson Excavation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
  5. Kasinger v. East End School District ex rel. Board of DirectorsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API