Legal Opinion

Fort Smith Service Finance Corp. v. Parrish

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 14, 1990No. 90-25PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dale Price, Justice.

The question in this case is whether the appellant’s acceptance of money, obtained as a result of a lien filed in a personal injury case, operated as an accord and satisfaction of a judgment in a different case. We hold it did not and reverse and remand.

The facts are that Claude Parrish’s daughter, Melinda, was injured in a car accident in 1985. She was treated at Sparks Regional Medical Center in Fort Smith, and incurred over $16,000 in medical expenses. Sparks assigned the account to the appellant, Fort Smith Service Finance Corporation (FSSFC).

To collect on the account,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Talbot v. JansenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  2. Jewell v. General Air Conditioning Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
  3. Buchanan v. Beirne Lumber CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  4. Dudley v. AdamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Crain Industries, Inc. v. CassSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  2. Glover v. Woodhaven Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  3. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Co. v. Thomas Linthicum, Patricia Linthicum, Christy LinthicumCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  4. Stuttgart Regional Medical Center v. CoxSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Johnston v. CurtisCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API