Legal Opinion

Johnston v. Curtis

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided May 10, 2000No. CA 99-941PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAM BIRD, Judge.

Appellants Gerald Johnston and Bebe Dare Johnston bring this appeal from the Circuit Court of Lonoke County contending that the court erred in finding that the parties orally modified a written real-estate contract and that their non-performance of the contract was not excused. Appellees Glen Curtis and Deanna Curtis have cross-appealed, stating that the court should have awarded them “expectancy” and punitive damages. We affirm the decision of the trial court on direct appeal and cross-appeal.

On October 9, 1997, the parties entered into a written real-estate contract, whereby…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Arkmo Lumber Co. v. CantrellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  2. National Bank of Commerce v. Dow Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  3. Van Camp v. Van CampSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Stacy v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
  5. Barbara Oil Co. v. Patrick Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Carter v. ClineSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
  2. Fouse v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
  3. Smith v. MaloneCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
  4. Stewart v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
  5. Miller v. NeilCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API