Legal Opinion
Keithan v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 3, 1970PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHouse, J.
This case is a sequel to Werner v. Keitham, 151 Conn. 673, 202 A.2d 150. Despite the variance in the spelling of the name, the plaintiff in this action was the named defendant in that case. The corporate defendants in this case are two insurance companies which had issued automobile liability policies. Massachusetts Bonding and Insurance Company, hereinafter referred to as Mass. Bonding, was the insurer for Porto Transport, Inc., a trucking company and common carrier hereinafter referred to as Porto. General Accident Fire and Life Assurance Corporation, Ltd., hereinafter referred to as…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Heyden Newport Chemical Corp. v. Southern General Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
- Lee v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Missionaries of the Co. of Mary, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Schurgast v. SchumannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Smedley Co. v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Co. of WisconsinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Hartford Casualty Insurance v. Litchfield Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- R.T. Vanderbilt Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Schilberg Integrated Metals Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Scott v. General Iron & Welding Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- LaBonte v. Federal Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.