Legal Opinion
Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense v. Applied Companies, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided December 10, 2002No. 01-1630PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHALL, Circuit Judge.
This suit arises from a requirements contract between the Defense Logistics Agency (“DLA”), a component of the Department of Defense, and Applied Companies, Inc. (“Applied”). Under the contract, among other things, DLA was to purchase from Applied all of its requirements for two types of refrigerant storage cylinders during the period from June of 1994 through June of 1995, with an option year. In its request for proposals (“RFP”), DLA estimated its annual requirements for the two types of cylinders at 62,945 and 56,550 units, respectively. Prior to contract award, DLA…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Miller v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Torncello v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- California Federal Bank, Fsb, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Energy Capital Corp. (As General Partner of Energy Capital Partners Limited Partnership) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Harvey Ward Locke v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense v. Applied Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Hi-Shear Technology Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- North American Construction Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense v. Applied Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense v. Applied Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.