Shigo, LLC v. Hocker
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Dissent
JUDGE BOORAS,
dissenting.
{ 19 I respectfully dissent from the majority's decision that water rights evidenced by shares in a mutual ditch company qualify as exempt from levy and execution by creditors under Colorado's homestead exemption statute. The majority reasons that by including a "farm" as property subject to the homestead exemption, the General Assembly in*427tended to include irrigation water rights that are necessary to grow crops. I disagree that the statutory homestead exemption was intended to shield mutual ditch company stock shares.
I. Whether Water Rights in Colorado Are…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- East Ridge of Fort Collins, LLC v. Larimer & Weld Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- Welby Gardens v. Adams County Bd. of EqualizationSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
- Board of County Commissioners v. Park County Sportsmen's Ranch, LLPSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Arnett v. LinhartSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
- People v. EmmertSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.