Legal Opinion

Snyder v. Henry

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 19, 1906No. Appeal, No. 132PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal, No. 132, Oct. T., 1906, by defendant, from order of C. P. No. 4, Phila. Co., March T., 1906, making absolute rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense in case of Benjamin W. Snyder v. Thomas Henry. Assumpsit for rent. Rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. JSrror assigned was order making absolute rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Porter, J.,

The statement of the plaintiff averred that the defendant went into possession of a dwelling house under the terms of a written lease, a copy of which was to the statement attached, for a term of seventeen months expiring March 31,1905, which lease contained a provision that either party might determine the lease at the end of said term, by giving the other notice thereof at least thirty days prior thereto, but in default of such notice the lease should continue upon the same terms and conditions for a further period of one year and so on from year to year, unless or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Auer v. PennSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
  2. Breuckmann v. TwibillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
  3. Lipper v. Bouvé, Crawford & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  4. Gardiner v. BairSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  5. Hastings v. BurchfieldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hochman v. KueblerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  2. Pfingstl v. Chenot Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. In re Heilbron Bros.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API