In re Heilbron Bros.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
iu Bankruptcy. Upon petition for review of the referee’s order denying the claim of David E. Dallam, trustee, for rent.
1Opinion of the Court
_ DICKINSON, District Judge.
[1, 2] Standing room for this peti-_ tion for review is afforded by the presence of one feature, and one feature only, of the cause. The question involved turns wholly upon a fact, and the fact has been found against the petitioner. Although it is true that the findings of the trier of facts will not be disturbed, unless devoid of substantial support in the evidence, fact inferences drawn will be reviewed and corrected, if the inference as drawn is unsupported by the facts as found, or if the wrong inference is drawn. This is based upon a distinction among facts.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Auer v. PennSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
- Breuckmann v. TwibillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
- Gardiner v. BairSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
- Hastings v. BurchfieldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
- Frank v. MaguireSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1862
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Budd v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1930
- Conover v. Sterling Stores Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1923