Legal Opinion

Pfingstl v. Chenot Et Ux.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 19, 1949No. Appeal, 40PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Fink, J.,

Isabelle Pfingstl, appellee, instituted an action in assumpsit against John Chenot and his wife, appellants, for $20.00 additional monthly rent due for a fourteen month period beginning March 1, 1946. The case was heard by the court below without a jury and, after hearing, judgment was entered for appellee in the sum of $280.00. This appeal is from the order and judgment of the court below dismissing appellants’ motions for a new trial and for judgment on the whole record. Appellants contend that during the period in question they continued as tenants from year to year…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McBrier v. MarshallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  2. Phillips v. MongesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1839
  3. Wilcox v. Montour Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  4. Abrams v. SherwinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  5. Snyder v. HenrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Emery v. MetznerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Reading Terminal Merchants Ass'n v. Samuel Rappaport AssociatesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Galizia v. Tardino, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1954
  4. Kenney v. Hambleton, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API