Lyon v. Lindblad
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Delta; Stone, J. Assumpsit by Louis E. Lyon and Milbert E. Price, copartners as the Lyon-Taylor Company, against Peter J. Lindblad for goods sold and delivered. There was judgment for plaintiffs for less than the amount claimed, and they bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.
Plaintiffs brought an action in assumpsit for the price and value of certain jewelry sold to defendant under a written agreement, for the sum of $324, claiming a balance due of $243. < This sale was negotiated by an agent of plaintiffs, and at the time of making the contracts, and when the goods were received, certain printed literature relative to the character and quality of the goods was furnished defendant. A promissory note for $81 was given by defendant for one quarter of the purchase price. The date of this note does not appear from the record, and it is immaterial for the reason that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Picard v. McCormickMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
- Kost v. BenderMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Maxted v. FowlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- McDonald v. BirssMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Ochsenkehl v. JeffersMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hakes v. ThayerMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- J. B. Millet Co. v. AndrewsMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Mishler v. International Harvester Co. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Johnson County Savings Bank v. GreggSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
- McKinley v. SmallMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.