Legal Opinion

J. B. Millet Co. v. Andrews

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1913No. Docket No. 86PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Error to Muskegon; Barton, J., presiding. Assumpsit in justice’s court by the J. B. Millet Company against Willis W. Andrews on a contract in writing, specially declared upon.. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, C. J.

The plaintiff is a corporation organ*352ized under the laws of New Hampshire, and, according to its letter heads, “publishers,” located at Boston, Mass. In July, 1911, it brought suit in justice’s court for the county of Muskegon, Mich., on the following written order:

“Date 10 — 27—10.
“J. B. Millet Company,
“120 Boyleston street, Boston, Mass.:
“Please deliver to me one complete set (12 vols.) of Spofford’s ‘Historic Characters and Famous Events,’ in red buckram binding, for which I agree to pay you $48.00. Title of said books to remain with J. B. Millet Company until paid for in full.
“[Signature]…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Phelps v. WhitakerMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Cook v. PerryMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Peck v. JenisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Stubly v. BeachboardMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Lyon v. LindbladMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Mesh v. CitrinMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Plate v. Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Rood v. Midwest Matrix Mart, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Gloeser v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Stowe v. MatherMichigan Supreme Court · 1926

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API