Legal Opinion

Ruhnau-Evans-Ruhnau Associates v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided August 22, 1983No. 511-81CPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge.

This case presents the interesting and apparently novel question whether section 12 of the Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. § 611 (Supp. IV 1980), authorizes payment of interest on an award to a contractor when the underlying claim was presented to the contracting officer by the government.

FACTS

Plaintiff, Ruhnau-Evans-Ruhnau (RER), an architectural engineering firm, contracted to provide drawings and specifications for the renovation of certain Air Force buildings. RER provided the plans and was paid for them. The Air Force subsequently awarded the renovation…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fidelity Construction Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  2. Pacific Coast Medical Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Youngdale & Sons Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  2. Z.A.N. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
  3. Hoffman Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
  4. Sun Eagle Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  5. Tiger Natural Gas, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API