Legal Opinion

Hyundai Elecs. Indus. Co. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided April 16, 2004No. Consol. 00-00027Published

1Opinion of the Court

Slip Op. 04-37 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE BEFORE: RICHARD W. GOLDBERG, SENIOR JUDGE HYUNDAI ELECTRONICS INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. and HYUNDAI ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., Plaintiffs, v. PUBLIC VERSION UNITED STATES, Cons. Court No. 00-01-00027 Defendant, and MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. Defendant- Intervenor. [Plaintiffs’ motion for judgment on agency record is granted in part and denied in part.] Date: April 16, 2004 Willkie, Farr, & Gallagher (Christopher A. Dunn, James P. Durling, and Daniel L. Porter) for plaintiff Hyundai Electronics. Kaye, Scholer, Fierman, Hays & Handler LLP…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Timex V.I., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  4. Pesquera Mares Australes Ltda. v. United States v. Coalition for Fair Atlantic Salmon TradeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  5. Ta Chen Stainless Steel Pipe, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API