Legal Opinion
Federal-Mogul Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided February 13, 1996No. Consolidated Court No. 93-08-00461PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*236Opinion
TSOUCALAS, Judge:
Plaintiffs, Federal-Mogul Corporation (“Federal-Mogul”) and The Torrington Company (“Torrington”), commenced this action challenging certain aspects of the Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration’s (“Commerce” or “ITA”) final results of administrative review entitled Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews and Revocation in Part of an Antidumping Duty Order (“Final Results”), 58 Fed. Reg. 39,729 (1993), as amended, Antifriction Bearings (Other Than Tapered Roller Bearings) and Parts Thereof From France, Germany, Italy, Japan,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Torrington Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Smith-Corona Group v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Coalition for the Preservation of American Brake Drum & Rotor Aftermarket Manufacturers v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
- FAG U.K. Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
- RHP Bearings, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
- NSK Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
- INA Walzlager Schaeffler KG v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.