Legal Opinion
Sears v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided January 28, 2016No. 12-889L and 13-404LPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Rails-to-trails takings case; class action; interest rate.to be applied as part of the otherwise tentatively agreed just compensation for a subclass
OPINION AND ORDER
LETTOW, Judge.
Before the court in this rails-to-trails takings case are the government’s motion for partial summary judgment and plaintiffs’ cross-motion for partial summary judgment under Rule 56(a) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). Both motions pertain to the interest rate that should be applied beyond February 3, 2016 as part of the just- compensation that has otherwise been tentatively agreed…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Kirby Forest Industries, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Sears v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Autoridad de Acueductos y Alcantarillados de Puerto Rico v. Cortés Flores y otrosSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2024
- Love Terminal Partners, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Katzin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Hardy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.