Legal Opinion
United States v. Clinton S. Parker, Also Known as Spanky
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided December 2, 1996No. 95-3899PublishedCited by 133 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POSNER, Chief Judge.
This is the second appeal by Clinton Parker. In his first appeal, we rejected all but one of his claims: that he should not have received an enhancement in his sentence' for obstructing justice. We vacated the judgment of the district court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with our opinion. 25 F.3d 442 (7th Cir.1994). On remand, the district court re-sentenced Parker by written order, without a new sentencing hearing. Parker appealed. His lawyer has filed an Anders brief, requesting permission to withdraw as counsel because there is no nonfrivolous…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. Walter BarnesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Gonzalo De Jesus TamayoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Marc L. PollandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Larry William JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by133 opinions
- United States v. Ernesto Quintieri, Carlo DonatoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Autozone, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- United States v. James E. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Eunice HusbandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.