Legal Opinion

United States v. James E. Campbell

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 29, 1999No. 97-5593PublishedCited by 133 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOORE, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Campbell appeals the decision of the district court, which held that it lacked discretion under this court’s prior remand to reconsider the quantity of drugs for which Campbell was held accountable despite a purported change in the Sentencing Guidelines. The district court held that the remand of this court limited it solely to the reconsideration of the fine imposed on Campbell. For the reasons stated below, we AFFIRM.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURE

A jury convicted James Campbell in 1990 of distribution of cocaine and conspiracy to distribute cocaine in violation…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. White v. MurthaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  4. United States v. James F. MooredCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Richard Harmon BellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by133 opinions

  1. David J. Scott v. Patrick Churchill, Inspector, Carson City Regional Facility, Philip BairCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  2. United States v. Richard Hough (00-3380) Lamont Needum (00-3381) Anthony Gibbs (00-3417) Chad Gibbs (00-3434) Antwan Woods (00-3592)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  3. United States v. Frank RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  4. United States v. GibbsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  5. State Ex Rel. Frazier & Oxley, L.C. v. CummingsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2004

128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API