Legal Opinion

Washington Water Jet Workers Ass'n v. Yarbrough

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 2004No. 70814-2PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridge, J.

In Washington Water Jet Workers Ass’n v. Yarbrough, 148 Wn.2d 403, 61 P.3d 309 (2003) (Water Jet I), this court held that article II, section 29 of the Washington Constitution solely applies to and prohibits the State from engaging in the contract system of prison labor. Id. at 405-06. Under that holding, the existing Class I Free Venture Industries program of prison labor created by RCW 72.09.100(1) did not violate article II, section 29. Water Jet I, 148 Wn.2d at 406. A motion for reconsideration was filed by the Washington Water Jet Workers Association (Water Jet). After review, we granted…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Robbins v. Chicago CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. State v. HalstienWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Storrs v. . the City of UticaNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  4. Southcenter Joint Venture v. National Democratic Policy CommitteeWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Blake v. . FerrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1851

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Chadwick Farms Owners Ass'n v. FHC LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Larson v. Seattle Popular Monorail AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Martinez-Cuevas v. DeRuyter Bros. Dairy, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Larson v. Seattle Popular Monorail Auth.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  5. City of Bothell v. BarnhartWashington Supreme Court · 2011

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API