Legal Opinion

Larson v. Seattle Popular Monorail Authority

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 2006No. 77073-5PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

f 1 Appellants, each a resident and motor vehicle owner in Seattle, challenge the trial court’s order on summary judgment dismissing all of their claims relating to the creation of the Seattle Popular Monorail Authority (SMP) and SMP’s imposition of a motor vehicle excise tax (MVET), as collected by the Department of Licensing. Appellants claim that taxing authority was improperly delegated to SMP under the state constitution, that the MVET is an excise tax, that SMP lacked jurisdiction to impose the MVET, and that the MVET is improperly imposed.

Madsen, J.

¶2 This court has recently addressed…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 587 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Barry & Barry, Inc. v. Department of Motor VehiclesWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Brower v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. King County v. Taxpayers of King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. King County Water District No. 54 v. King County Boundary Review BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Amunrud v. Board of AppealsWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. WASH. STATE FARM BUREAU FEDER. v. GregoireWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Pierce County v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Pierce County v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Locke v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2007

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API