M. R. Harris Estate v. West Grove Savings Bank
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
Morling, J. —
Intervener was denied appointment as receiver of the West Grove Savings Bank because of his being interested adversely to the bank and its creditors. It is argued in the certiorari proceedings, and is argued here, that, under the present banking laws, only the superintendent of banking may be appointed receiver of any closed bank, and that the court has no jurisdiction to appoint anyone else, regardless of personal interest of the superintendent. In our view of the case, we have no occasion to discuss the question as applied to a bank which merely closes its doors without making…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- State ex rel. Hovey v. NobleIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Kentucky Union Co. v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- State ex rel. White v. BarkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- In re Appointment & Removal of the Janitor of the Supreme CourtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Grant v. FritzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
- Priest v. Whitney Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1935
- Cooper v. OteroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1934
- Abbott v. ChristopherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
- In Re Receivership City-Com. Sav. BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.