Legal Opinion

Caruthers v. Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided April 18, 1997No. Civil Action 96-2071-GTVPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

VAN BEBBER, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff William R. Caruthers filed this disability discrimination suit, alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.; Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq.; and Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), 29 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq. The case comes before the court on the defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment (Doc. 31) on the plaintiff’s ADA and FMLA claims. For the reasons stated below, the motion is denied in part and granted in part.

Factual Background

The defendant…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. United Air Lines, Inc. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mondaine v. American Drug Stores, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2006
  2. Wells v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2002
  3. Caruthers v. Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1998
  4. Thornberry v. Powell County Detention CenterDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API