Legal Opinion
Caruthers v. Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided January 13, 1998No. CIV.A. No. 96-2071-GTVPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VAN BEBBER, Chief Judge.
This case is before the court on plaintiff’s motions for attorney fees (Docs. 122 & 123).1 Plaintiff predicates his requests both on his alleged prevailing party status as well as alleged discovery violations by defendant. For the reasons set forth below, the motions are denied.
I. Background
Plaintiff originally filed this action alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., and the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), 29…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Harolds Stores, Inc. v. Dillard Department Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Roe v. Cheyenne Mountain Conference Resort, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lintz v. American General Finance, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1999
- Carr v. Fort Morgan School DistrictDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1998
- M.B. v. Lee (JRG1)District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2023