Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. McNear

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 14, 2004PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

GANTMAN, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant, Demetrius McNear, has filed this appeal from his judgment of sentence and asks us to determine whether the trial court erred when it denied him relief on his motion to dismiss pursuant to Pa.R.Crim.P. 600. Appellant also raises a challenge to the discretionary aspects of his sentence. For the following reasons, we hold the trial court properly excluded Appellant’s pre-arrest time from his Rule 600 run date. We further hold Appellant’s sentencing issue is waived for purposes of appellate review. Accordingly, we affirm.

¶ 2 Upon review of the certified…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TuladzieckiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. MouzonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Commonwealth v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Commonwealth v. HunterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HuntSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Commonwealth v. GouldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Commonwealth v. GoldmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Commonwealth v. BoozeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API