Armstrong v. Loomis
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kent. (Grove, J..) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
Plaintiff’s testator was the administrator of the estate of Henry Loomis, deceased, whose sole heir was the defendant, Charles H. Loomis. At the time of Henry Loomis’ death the defendant was a minor, and his mother was appointed his guardian. It appears that Mr. Armstrong failed to render an account of his trusteeship to the probate court. After Charles became of age, he presented a petition to that court asking for an accounting. A long-litigation followed, which finally resulted in establishing Mr. Armstrong’s claim against the estate for $1,155,63. Loomis v. Armstrong, 63 Mich. 355. This…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Showers v. RobinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Loomis v. ArmstrongMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Hill v. MitchellMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ogooshevitz v. ArnoldMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- First National Bank v. ConnollyOregon Supreme Court · 1942
- Rankin v. City of Big RapidsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
- Staniszewski v. LaneMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Van Norsdall v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.