Legal Opinion

Hill v. Mitchell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1879PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Kent. Bill to remove cloud from title and cross-bill to restrain the sale of the land.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

These are somewhat remarkable cases. The complainant in the original bill is administrator of Charles R. Mitchell, a former resident in Kent county in this State, who died in February, 1873, intestate. By the bill which makes Mary C. [Mitchell and Samuel C. Chesney defendants, he avers that his intestate died seized of a certain forty acres of land in Kent county of the value of sixteen hundred dollars, and covered with pine timber; that the intestate owed several hundred dollars of debts and had no personal or other property from *391which they might be paid except the land aforesaid; that Peter…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. De Bow v. WollenbergOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Armstrong v. LoomisMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. In re Norton's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API