Legal Opinion
Holland v. City of New York
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 24, 2016No. 14 Civ. 5517 (AT)PublishedCited by 93 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ANALISA TORRES, District Judge:
Plaintiff pro se, Rasheem M. Holland, a practicing Muslim, brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the City of New York (the “City”), City Department of Correction officials, and individual correction officers, alleging that his constitutional rights were violated when, as a pretrial detainee at Rikers Island, he was subjected to a visual body cavity strip search by a female officer. Am. Compl, ECF No. 21; Def. Mem. 1, 3, ECF No. 34. Defendants move to dismiss the amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure…
2Cases cited102 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- Green v. MartinDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2016
- Colon v. AnnucciDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Jackson v. TelladoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Perez v. PonteDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Walker v. City of N.Y.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.