Legal Opinion
Warner v. Torrence
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided September 18, 1968No. 6820SC343PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
The facts alleged in the complaint are sufficient to constitute two causes of action, on either of which, if proven, the plaintiff is entitled to recover of the defendant damages, both actual and punitive. In Chestnut v. Sutton, 207 N.C. 256, 176 S.E. 743, it is stated:
“(T)hat the gravamen of the cause of action for the alienation of the affections of plaintiff’s wife is the deprivation of the plaintiff 'of his conjugal rights to the society, affection and assistance of his wife, and that the gravamen of the cause-of action -for criminal conversation is the defilement of plaintiff’s wife by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Powell v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Powell v. . StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Walker v. . WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Hankins v. . HankinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Hardison v. GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sebastian v. KluttzCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
- Heist v. HeistCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Gray v. HooverCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- Cannon v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Owens v. OwensCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976