Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Ass'n. v. Whittier Union High School District
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GATES, J.
The instant case presents an issue of first impression, i.e.: May school districts qualify as “special districts” within the meaning of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the Act)? (Sts. & Hy. Code, § 22500 et seq.) The trial court concluded they do and entered summary judgment in favor of defendants Whittier Union High School District and Bonita Unified School District. Plaintiffs Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association et al. appeal, challenging that determination. 1
Respondent Whittier Union High School District owns and operates the facilities and grounds at six high…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Woosley v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Arcadia Unified School District v. State Department of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Kennedy v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Hartzell v. ConnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hoogasian Flowers, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Highland Neighborhood Watch Letitia E. Pepper v. Riverside Unified School District James L. KimbleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Opinion No. (1997), California Attorney General Reports1997
- Opinion No. (1997), California Attorney General Reports1997
- Opinion No. (2001), California Attorney General Reports2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.