Legal Opinion

Opinion No. (1997)

California Attorney General Reports

Decided April 25, 1997Published

1Opinion of the Court

DANIEL E. LUNGREN Attorney General ANTHONY M. SUMMERS Deputy Attorney General

THE HONORABLE PATRICK B. GREENWELL, TUOLOMNE COUNTY COUNSEL, has requested an opinion on the following question:

May a school district require that the parents of pupils who have unexcused absences from school reimburse the district for its reduction in state funding caused by the unexcused absences?

CONCLUSION

A school district may not require that the parents of pupils who have unexcused absences from school reimburse the district for its reduction in state funding caused by the unexcused absences.

ANALYSIS

The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. California Correctional Peace Officers Ass'n. v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Arcadia Unified School District v. State Department of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Hartzell v. ConnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. California Teachers Assn. v. HayesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API