Legal Opinion

Highland Neighborhood Watch Letitia E. Pepper v. Riverside Unified School District James L. Kimble

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 12, 1996No. 94-55033Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

87 F.3d 1319

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

HIGHLAND NEIGHBORHOOD WATCH; Letitia E. Pepper, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

RIVERSIDE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT; James L. Kimble,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-55033.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Feb. 9, 1996.

Decided June 12, 1996.

1

Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ellis v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Goodman v. Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Ass'n. v. Whittier Union High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API