Legal Opinion
State v. Schmidt-Tiago Construction Co.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided December 31, 1985No. Civ. A. No. 84-Z-1224PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DONALD E. ABRAM, United States Magistrate.
The parties have filed various motions with the court. A hearing has been held by the Magistrate, and the following findings of fact, conclusions of law and order are hereby entered.
The defendant, Schmidt-Tiago Construction Company has filed a Motion for an Order Compelling Discovery as to interrogatories and requests for production of documents. The plaintiff, the State of Colorado, has filed three motions. They have filed a Motion for an Order Compelling the defendant, Schmidt-Tiago to provide information on certain designated projects. It has…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Sells Engineering, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Andritz Sprout-Bauer, Inc. v. Beazer East, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. Midland Bancor, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1994
- Snowden v. Connaught Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1991
- In re Grand Jury SubpoenaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
- O'Connor v. Boeing North American, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.