Legal Opinion
Andritz Sprout-Bauer, Inc. v. Beazer East, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 28, 1997No. 4:CV-95-1182PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCLURE, District Judge.
BACKGROUND:
This action1 arises out of efforts to recoup environmental contamination cleanup costs *615incurred in connection with two sites owned by plaintiff Andritz Sprout-Bauer, Inc. (An-dritz).2
One of the sites is located in Muncy Borough and Muncy Creek Township, Lycoming County, Pennsylvania (the Muncy site). An-dritz seeks to recover cleanup costs incurred at the Muncy site from defendants Beazer East, Inc. (Beazer)3 and Bridon-American Corp. (Bridón).
CREWE, VIRGINIA SITE
The other site which is the subject of this action is located in Crewe, Nottoway County,…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. National Sea Clammers Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Gwaltney of Smithfield, Ltd. v. Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Donald v. Amoco Production Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1999
- Boyd v. Comdata Network, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
- Merrill v. Waffle House, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2005
- Joe v. Prison Health Services, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.