Legal Opinion

Matter of Hegstrom

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1987No. SB 86-0038-DPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Justice.

The Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Arizona has recommended that respondent, Gregory L. Hegstrom, be disbarred. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 53(e), Rules of the Supreme Court, 17A A.R.S. 1

In 1975, respondent was admitted in Texas to the practice of law and later was admitted in Arizona. He practiced in Riveria, Mohave County. He has been charged with three counts of unethical conduct, which we will discuss individually.

COUNT I

In May of 1982, respondent was retained by Mary Ann Finn to pursue an action in fraud. A $750 retainer fee was paid and…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Barmat v. John and Jane Doe Partners ADArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Matter of PetrieArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  3. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, NefsteadArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  4. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona ZangArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  5. In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, EnganArizona Supreme Court · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API