State ex rel. Tivol Plaza, Inc. v. Missouri Commission on Human Rights
Supreme Court of Missouri
1DissentZel M. Fischer, Chief Justice
I write separately because there is no compelling reason to depart from this Court’s clear admonition and declaration of law expressed in United States Department of Veterans Affairs v. Boresi, 396 S.W.3d 356, 359 n.1 (Mo. banc 2013), that a circuit court’s
practice of issuing a summons in lieu of a preliminary writ is not authorized by Rule 94. Writs are extraordinary remedies, and their procedures differ from normal civil actions. The practice of issuing a summons rather than a preliminary order fails to acknowledge the nature of the remedy. Additionally, it requires a response from the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dorris v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
- Furlong Companies v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
- Tisch v. DST Systems, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- United States Department of Veterans Affairs v. BoresiSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
- Sitelines, L.L.C. v. Pentstar Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.